<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nanofunk.net &#187; review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nanofunk.net/tag/review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nanofunk.net</link>
	<description>audio production blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 09:24:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Apple 15-inch MacBook Pro (Late 2011) is slower in every category than the early 2011 model</title>
		<link>http://www.nanofunk.net/apple-15-inch-macbook-pro-late-2011-is-slower-in-every-category-than-the-early-2011-model/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=apple-15-inch-macbook-pro-late-2011-is-slower-in-every-category-than-the-early-2011-model</link>
		<comments>http://www.nanofunk.net/apple-15-inch-macbook-pro-late-2011-is-slower-in-every-category-than-the-early-2011-model/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 12:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanofunk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commuity Submitted News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thunderbolt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[15"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anandtech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bargain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geekbench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[late]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refurbished]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nanofunk.net/?p=782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The early 2011 MacBook Pro is Apple's masterpiece, no doubt: besides the overheating problems that many of us reported (but which seem to be solved as of now). Core i7 MPBs are super-fast with a Geekbench score of over 10.000 points for the i7 quad-core version - this was and still is an awesome performance [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000BNHM0C/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=nanofunknetau-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B000BNHM0C"><img src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Screen-Shot-2011-12-21-at-1.44.58-PM.png" alt="The Mac Book Pro early 2011 is the best bargain you can get: better and cheaper than the late 2011 version, it can be currently bought as refurbished and you won&#039;t regret it. We currently have 2 machines of those and can totally recommend them." title="The Mac Book Pro early 2011 is the best bargain you can get: better and cheaper than the late 2011 version, it can be currently bought as refurbished and you won&#039;t regret it. We currently have 2 machines of those and can totally recommend them." width="574" height="317" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-787" /></a></p>
<p>The early 2011 MacBook Pro is Apple's masterpiece, no doubt: besides the <a href="http://www.nanofunk.net/apple-macbook-pro-quad-core-early-2011-i7-fast-powerhorse-design-flaws-and-hardware-issues/" target="_blank">overheating problems that many of us reported</a> (but which seem to be solved as of now). Core i7 MPBs are super-fast with a <a href="http://pdt.tradedoubler.com/click?a(2050460)p(23761)prod(687707781)ttid(5)url(http%3A%2F%2Fitunes.apple.com%2Fde%2Fapp%2Fgeekbench%2Fid409291719%3Fmt%3D8%26uo%3D2%26partnerId%3D2003)" title="Geekbench provides a comprehensive set of tests engineered to quickly and accurately measure processor and memory performance. Designed to make benchmarks easy to run and easy to understand, Geekbench takes the guesswork out of producing robust and reliable benchmark results." target="_blank">Geekbench</a> score of <a href="http://www.primatelabs.ca/blog/2011/02/macbookpro-benchmarks-early-2011/" target="_blank">over 10.000 points</a> for the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0017HSZWK/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B0017HSZWK" target="_blank">i7 quad-core version</a> - this was and still is an awesome performance for a notebook. </p>
<p>If you are planning on buying a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005CWJ76O/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B005CWJ76O" target="_blank">new MacBook Pro 15"</a>, keep in mind that newer does not necessarily mean better: the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0017HSZWK/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B0017HSZWK" target="_blank">early 2011 MacBook Pro</a> is currently the best deal you can get (<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000BNHM0C/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B000BNHM0C" target="_blank">$1,549.99 for a new</a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000BNHM0C/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B000BNHM0C" target="_blank">$1,499.99 for refurbished MC721LL/A 15.4-Inch quad Core</a> on Amazon) especially since they <a href="http://www.nanofunk.net/apple-macbook-pro-quad-core-early-2011-i7-fast-powerhorse-design-flaws-and-hardware-issues/" target="_blank">fixed all the flaws people reported about</a>. I was <a href="http://www.nanofunk.net/apple-macbook-pro-quad-core-early-2011-i7-fast-powerhorse-design-flaws-and-hardware-issues/" target="_blank">complaining about issues</a> a lot, but after Apple replaced the two notebooks we had, the run smootly ever since.</p>
<p>So a clear winner for buying a new MacBook Pro in 2011/2012 is the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000BNHM0C/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B000BNHM0C">Apple MacBook Pro MC721LL/A 15.4-Inch early 2011 model</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=nanofunknetau-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B000BNHM0C" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> that <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/5113/apple-15inch-macbook-pro-late-2011-review" target="_blank">performs better in most of the situations</a> compared to the late 2011 version (review and benchmarks by <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/5113/apple-15inch-macbook-pro-late-2011-review" target="_blank">anandtech</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nanofunk.net/apple-15-inch-macbook-pro-late-2011-is-slower-in-every-category-than-the-early-2011-model/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook &#8220;Open Compute&#8221; Server tested by Anandtech</title>
		<link>http://www.nanofunk.net/facebook-open-compute-server-tested-by-anandtech/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=facebook-open-compute-server-tested-by-anandtech</link>
		<comments>http://www.nanofunk.net/facebook-open-compute-server-tested-by-anandtech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 09:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanofunk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tweaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anandtech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memcache]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memcached]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motherboard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open compute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[savings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[servers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nanofunk.net/?p=730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook designed an AMD and an Intel motherboard - all manufactured by Quanta. Their main aim was to make more efficient and cheaper servers: “The result is a data center full of vanity free servers which is 38% more efficient and 24% less expensive to build and run than other state-of-the-art data centers.” The efficiency [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook designed an AMD and an Intel motherboard - all manufactured by Quanta. Their main aim was to make more efficient and cheaper servers: <em>“The result is a data center full of vanity free servers which is 38% more efficient and 24% less expensive to build and run than other state-of-the-art data centers.”</em> The efficiency of the voltage regulators: 94%. Everything was removed, that was not absolutely necessary: the motherboards have no BMC, very few USB (2) and NIC ports (2), one expansion slot, and are headless (no videochip).</p>
<p><em>Facebook had 22 Million active users in the middle of 2007; fast forward to 2011 and the site now has 800 Million active users, with 400 million of them logging in every day. Facebook has grown exponentially, to say the least! To cope with this kind of exceptional growth and at the same time offer a reliable and cost effective service requires out of the box thinking. Typical high-end, brute force, ultra redundant software and hardware platforms (for example Oracle RAC databases running on top of a few IBM Power 795 systems) won’t do as they're too complicated, power hungry, and most importantly far too expensive for such extreme scaling.</em> (quoting <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/4958/facebooks-open-compute-server-tested">Anandtech</a>)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/4958/facebooks-open-compute-server-tested/3"><img src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Intel-Motherboard-Large-1024x640_575px.jpg" alt="" title="Intel-Motherboard-Large-1024x640_575px" width="600" height="375" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-731" /></a></p>
<p>"The AMD servers are mostly used as Memcached servers, as the four channels of AMD Magny-cours Opterons 6100 are capable of using 12 DIMMs per CPU, or 24 DIMMs in total. That works out to 384GB of caching memory."</p>
<p>It remains unclear, when or if that server hardware will be available for purchase - but it looks like there will be some cloud/datacenter providers jumping on the idea of the open compute servers, so it might be possible to rent them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nanofunk.net/facebook-open-compute-server-tested-by-anandtech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparison: Canon Camera Roundup for Pro-DSLR Video</title>
		<link>http://www.nanofunk.net/canon-cameras-for-pro-dslr-video-comparison/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=canon-cameras-for-pro-dslr-video-comparison</link>
		<comments>http://www.nanofunk.net/canon-cameras-for-pro-dslr-video-comparison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanofunk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[canon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canon EOS 5D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[500d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[550d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[5D MKII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[600d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60d]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bitrate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comaprison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[converted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr-video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ef]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[is]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lenses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lexar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magic lantern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sdhc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sdxc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second hand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t1i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t2i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t3i]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[values]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zebra]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nanofunk.net/?p=570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since lot of people ask me, which (photo) cameras to buy which also work for filming, here is a short roundup of cameras that I find worth mentioning. All of the cameras mentioned will work with Magic Lantern: On-screen audio meters Manual gain control with no AGC Zebra stripes (video peaking) Custom Cropmarks for 16:9, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since lot of people ask me, which (photo) cameras to buy which also work for filming, here is a short roundup of cameras that I find worth mentioning. All of the cameras mentioned will work with <a href="http://magiclantern.wikia.com/wiki/Magic_Lantern_Firmware_Wiki">Magic Lantern</a>: </p>
<li>On-screen audio meters
<li>Manual gain control with no AGC
<li>Zebra stripes (video peaking)
<li>Custom Cropmarks for 16:9, 2.35:1, 4:3 and any other format
<li>Control of focus and bracketing
<li>(among other changes, such as Video-Bitrate setting)<br />
<br/><br/></p>
<p><strong>Price/Value/Feature Comparison</strong></p>
<table border="0" width="500">
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001XURPQI/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399369&#038;creativeASIN=B001XURPQI">Canon Rebel T1i<br/>Canon EOS 500D</a></p>
<td valign="top">
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0035FZJI0/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399369&#038;creativeASIN=B0035FZJI0">Canon Rebel T2i<br/>Canon EOS 550D</a></p>
<td valign="top">
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004M170YC/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399373&#038;creativeASIN=B004M170YC">Canon Rebel T3i<br/>Canon EOS 600D</a></p>
<td valign="top">
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0040JHVCC/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399369&#038;creativeASIN=B0040JHVCC">Canon EOS 60D<br/>&nbsp;</a>
</td>
<td>
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001G5ZTLS/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399369&#038;creativeASIN=B001G5ZTLS">Canon EOS 5D MKII<br/>&nbsp;</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><img style="margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;" src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/500d2.png" alt="500d" title="500d.png" border="0" width="90" /></td>
<td><img style="margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;" src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/60d2.png" alt="60d" title="60d.png" border="0" width="90" /></td>
<td><img style="margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;" src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/550d1.png" alt="550d" title="550d.png" border="0" width="90" /></td>
<td><img style="margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;" src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/60d.png" alt="60d" title="60d.png" border="0" width="90" /></td>
<td><img style="margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;" src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/5dmkii.png" alt="5dmkii" title="5dmkii.png" border="0" width="90" /></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001XURPQI/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399369&#038;creativeASIN=B001XURPQI">USA: $579.90</a><br/><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B0020MLHX0/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=p1ngnet-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1638&#038;creative=19454&#038;creativeASIN=B0020MLHX0">Europe: 449.00€ (used)</a>
</td>
<td ><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0035FZJI0/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399369&#038;creativeASIN=B0035FZJI0">USA: $629.00</a><br/><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B0037KM2II/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=p1ngnet-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1638&#038;creative=19454&#038;creativeASIN=B0037KM2II">Europe: 549.99€</a>
</td>
<td><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004M170YC/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399373&#038;creativeASIN=B004M170YC">USA: $699.95</a><br/><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B004MKNBIW/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=p1ngnet-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1638&#038;creative=19454&#038;creativeASIN=B004MKNBIW">Europe: 646.99€</a></td>
<td><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0040JHVCC/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399369&#038;creativeASIN=B0040JHVCC">USA: 1,029.00$</a><br/><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B0040X44S2/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=p1ngnet-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1638&#038;creative=19454&#038;creativeASIN=B0040X44S2">Europe: 879.00€</a>
</td>
<td><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001G5ZTLS/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399369&#038;creativeASIN=B001G5ZTLS">USA: 2,499.00$</a><br/><br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B001G7PBIC/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=p1ngnet-21&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1638&#038;creative=19454&#038;creativeASIN=B001G7PBIC">Europe: 1,890.00€</a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">The Revel T1i was a great camera, although we cannot recommend it, since its successor is the 550D and the 600D. If you can get a cheap second hand alternative at ebay, you might get a deal, though. (<a target="_self" href="http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?icep_ff3=9&#038;pub=5574900356&#038;toolid=10001&#038;campid=5336710729&#038;customid=&#038;icep_uq=rebel+t1i&#038;icep_sellerId=&#038;icep_ex_kw=&#038;icep_sortBy=12&#038;icep_catId=&#038;icep_minPrice=&#038;icep_maxPrice=&#038;ipn=psmain&#038;icep_vectorid=229466&#038;kwid=902099&#038;mtid=824&#038;kw=lg">Seen on ebay for $199 used</a>)<img style="text-decoration:none;border:0;padding:0;margin:0;" src="http://rover.ebay.com/roverimp/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?ff3=9&#038;pub=5574900356&#038;toolid=10001&#038;campid=5336710729&#038;customid=&#038;uq=rebel+t1i&#038;mpt=[CACHEBUSTER]"></td>
<td valign="top">The 550D is a great camera, although the 600D beats it in price/value. If you can get your hands on a cheap second-hand 550D, you might be able to even save some more bucks. (<a target="_self" href="http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?icep_ff3=9&#038;pub=5574900356&#038;toolid=10001&#038;campid=5336710729&#038;customid=&#038;icep_uq=rebel+t2i&#038;icep_sellerId=&#038;icep_ex_kw=&#038;icep_sortBy=12&#038;icep_catId=&#038;icep_minPrice=&#038;icep_maxPrice=&#038;ipn=psmain&#038;icep_vectorid=229466&#038;kwid=902099&#038;mtid=824&#038;kw=lg">Seen on ebay for $399 used</a><img style="text-decoration:none;border:0;padding:0;margin:0;" src="http://rover.ebay.com/roverimp/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?ff3=9&#038;pub=5574900356&#038;toolid=10001&#038;campid=5336710729&#038;customid=&#038;uq=rebel+t2i&#038;mpt=[CACHEBUSTER]">) </td>
<td valign="top">The 600D is our definite winner in price/value: feature-rich, reasonably priced, enjoyable to use and, most importantly, takes great pictures. It's relatively small, but is fully supported by Magic Lantern and you should be really happy with that camera if you use good lenses and fast Compact Flash Cards.</td>
<td valign="top">The 60D is a great camera, although almost in the same range as the 7D (which has no Magic Lantern support yet). If you are only shooting photos, go for the 7D - if you are doing video, save some bucks and go for the 600D. Invest the spare money in good lenses.</td>
<td valign="top">The best of all the cameras compared, if we leave out the price. While this is also the most pricy camera, it certainly gets beaten by the 600D when it comes to price/value. The Canon EOS 5D MKII is the best camera for digital video out there, although with the 600D and with fast enough SDXC cards, you will almost match the quality of the 5D MKII.</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><strong>Conclusio:</strong> get the 600D if you need to save money, get the 5D MKII if you have some spare 3000$. Invest in good lenses, such as the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000AZ57M6/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399369&#038;creativeASIN=B000AZ57M6">Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B000AZ57M6&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399369" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />, even if you are using it on the 600D (it will <a href="http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Canon24105mmL_with_400D_XTi/verdict.shtml">get converted to a 38-168mm</a>, though). The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0011NVMO8/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399369&#038;creativeASIN=B0011NVMO8">Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4.0-5.6 IS</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B0011NVMO8&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399369" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> is a cheap but quite good alternative. Make sure you get <a href="http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&#038;redirect=true&#038;ref_=sr_nr_n_0&#038;keywords=SDXC&#038;bbn=502394&#038;qid=1313400182&#038;rnid=502394&#038;rh=n%3A172282%2Ck%3ASDXC%2Cn%3A%21493964%2Cn%3A502394%2Cn%3A172435#?_encoding=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=ur2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957">a really fast SDXC card</a><img src="https://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=nanofunknetau-20&#038;l=ur2&#038;o=1" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" />, since you will want to increase the <a href="http://magiclantern.wikia.com/wiki/Bit_rate">Video Bitrate</a> with Magic Lantern to make your videos quality increase as well. Recommendation: the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004QWRZWY/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399373&#038;creativeASIN=B004QWRZWY">Lexar Media 64 GB SDXC Flash Memory Card LSD64GCRBNA133</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B004QWRZWY&#038;camp=217145&#038;creative=399373" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /> stores 64GB (!) and is blazingly fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nanofunk.net/canon-cameras-for-pro-dslr-video-comparison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple MacBook Pro Quad Core (early 2011) i7: fast powerhorse with design flaws and hardware issues</title>
		<link>http://www.nanofunk.net/apple-macbook-pro-quad-core-early-2011-i7-fast-powerhorse-design-flaws-and-hardware-issues/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=apple-macbook-pro-quad-core-early-2011-i7-fast-powerhorse-design-flaws-and-hardware-issues</link>
		<comments>http://www.nanofunk.net/apple-macbook-pro-quad-core-early-2011-i7-fast-powerhorse-design-flaws-and-hardware-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanofunk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gadgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[core]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crashing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desktop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discussion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faulty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fixed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeze]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geekbench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gpu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[i7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ifixit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kernel panic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laptop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[late]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[load]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mac pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbookpro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macintosh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macrumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mbp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MC721LL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MD318LL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overheating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quadcore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refurbished]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rpm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sandybridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sloppy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[under]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unstable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xeon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zdnet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nanofunk.net/?p=341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While the new Apple MacBook Pro Machines are really fast desktop-like speed packed monsters, it seems like they also have severe hardware design faults as outlined by zdnet and ifixit. With a geekbench score over 10.000 the new MacBook Pro (early 2011) beats the Mac Pro (Early 2009) Intel Xeon W5590 3.33 GHz (4 cores). All the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/28-02-2011-22-18-10.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-343" title="28-02-2011-22-18-10" src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/28-02-2011-22-18-10.png" alt="Apple gets sloppy: too much thermal paste on the early 2011 MacBook Pro" width="147" height="316" /></a></p>
<p>While the new <a href="http://www.apple.com/macbookpro/" target="blank">Apple MacBook Pro Machines</a> are really fast desktop-like speed packed monsters, it seems like they also have <a href="http://www.zdnet.com/blog/hardware/hey-apple-dont-start-getting-sloppy/11652?tag=content;search-results-rivers" target="_blank">severe hardware design faults as outlined by zdnet and ifixit</a>. With a <a title="apple macbook pro quad 2011 early mbp geekbench" href="http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/search?q=macbookpro8%2C2&amp;commit=Search" target="_blank">geekbench</a> score over 10.000 the new <a href="http://www.amazon.de/gp/product/B004P8JHSY/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=p1ngnet-21&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1638&amp;creative=19454&amp;creativeASIN=B004P8JHSY">MacBook Pro (early 2011)</a><img style="border: none !important; margin: 0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.de/e/ir?t=&amp;l=as2&amp;o=3&amp;a=B004P8JHSY" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /> <a title=" new MacBook Pro (early 2011) beats the Mac Pro (Early 2009) Intel Xeon W5590 3.33 GHz (4 cores)" href="http://www.primatelabs.ca/geekbench/mac-benchmarks/" target="_blank">beats the Mac Pro</a> (Early 2009) Intel Xeon W5590 3.33 GHz (4 cores). All the good talk and benchmarks cannot make up for the current problems Apple users are facing with their brand new machines:</p>
<ul>
<li> <a title="apple macbook pro early 2011 too much thermal paste f'cks up the cpu temperature hardware fail" href="http://www.ifixit.com/Answers/View/45252/Thermal+Paste+-+MacBook+Pro+15%27%27+Unibody+Early+2011" target="_blank">too much thermal paste seems to raise the CPU temperature</a></li>
<li><a title="apple macbook pro early 2011 too much thermal paste f'cks up the cpu temperature hardware fail" href="http://www.ifixit.com/Answers/View/45252/Thermal+Paste+-+MacBook+Pro+15%27%27+Unibody+Early+2011" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.ivy-rose.co.uk/Health/Health-Articles.php?id=3715" target="_blank">fans running at 6000rpm+ constantly</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.ivy-rose.co.uk/Health/Health-Articles.php?id=3715" target="_blank"></a><a title="Apple Macbook Pro 8,2 Kernel Panic Freeze Bug Hardware Fail" href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2768351&amp;start=120&amp;tstart=0" target="_blank">frequent kernel panics or freezes that are maybe related to the new GPU</a></li>
<li><a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2764570&amp;tstart=0" target="_blank">heating issues with the whole MBP early 2011 series</a></li>
</ul>
<p>Come on Apple, wake up and fix those machine fast, as lots of us could benefit from a stable quad-core laptop solution (talking audio plugs and realtime audio performance).</p>
<p><strong>We can recommend to tell apple to send the replacements <span style="text-decoration: underline;">before</span> they pick up the faulty machines, so it is easier to transfer the data already on it. (apple care even suggested it this way)</strong></p>
<p>[UPDATE] <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9211839/Apple_s_new_MacBook_Pros_raise_quality_concerns">Gregg Keizer from Computerworld</a> also writes about quality concerns regarding the new Apple Notebooks and there is also a <a href="http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=13172961">discussion about actual "Overheating"</a> going on in the Apple Forums. Well, I can confirm the issue exists and the current MacBook Pro Models freeze a lot. If it is a hardware, software or firmware issue remains unclear.</p>
<p>[UPDATE] There is a <a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=12137761#post12137761" target="_blank">macrumors forum thread</a> discussing that there were issues with the 2010 MBPs as well when they came out. <a href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1109471" target="_blank">Another thread at macrumors forum</a> tries to sort out if it is a hardware or software issue.<br />
<a href="http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum_thread.php?id=6422" target="_blank">Some people suspect it is related to internal graphics switching</a>, but there really seems to be something going on since also <a href="http://discussions.info.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2775930&amp;tstart=120" target="_blank">reports on the apple discussion forums are increasing</a>.</p>
<p>[UPDATE] as of 2011/03/14 macrumors suggest in their forum to "<a title="If you are concerned about heat/fan noise of the early 2011 MacBook Pro models, go 2010 or wait for Ivy Bridge" href="http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1116570">go 2010 or wait for ivy bridge</a>". The early 2011 version of the MacBook Pro das 45W TDP vs. last generation's 35w. That's a big increase which automatically makes the whole series go louder and more hot than the 2010 model.</p>
<p>[UPDATE] 2011/03/21: Macrumors posted a story: "<a href="http://www.macrumors.com/2011/03/21/2011-macbook-pros-crashing-under-load/">2011 MacBook Pros Crashing Under Load?</a>"</p>
<p>[UPDATE] 2011/03/21: <a href="Mac OS X 10.6.7 released with 2011 MacBook Pro fixes #apple #osx #leopard http://bit.ly/hyn8KQ">Mac OSX 10.6.7 Update</a> was just announced by Apple. Unfortunately, on the two machines we have here, the update does not fix anything related to CPU temperature. Still there are frequent freezes as well.</p>
<p>[UPDATE] 2011/03/22: dailytech confirms that <a id="ctl00_MainContent_lblHeadline" href="http://www.dailytech.com/New+MacBook+Pros+Freezing+When+Stressed+Update+Adds+More+Problems/article21184.htm">New MacBook Pros Freezing When Stressed, Update Adds More Problems</a></p>
<p>[UPDATE] 2011/03/28: we received our two replacement MacBook Pros. They don't seem to have any issues and also still did not freeze on us! Also the fans are not spinning like crazy anymore! For all people affected by any of the issues reported above: get your Notebooks replaced! Apple is aware of the issues and replaces faulty hardware (we had to wait for two weeks though).</p>
<p>[UPDATE] 2011/04/23: the current Systems freeze 2-3 times a day. Not all the issues seem to be solved! You should definitely get a late 2010 model, if you need a highly stable system!</p>
<p><strong>[UPDATE] 2011/11/01: Apple replaced one of our 15-inch MBP MC721LL/A machine and the freezes are not appearing anymore. Reports from other users that bought an early 2011 model are positive, so currently the advice would be to get a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000BNHM0C/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B000BNHM0C">refurbished Apple MacBook Pro MC721LL/A 15.4-Inch Laptop</a> even before getting a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B005CWJ1DI/ref=as_li_ss_tl?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=nanofunknetau-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B005CWJ1DI">MD318LL/A 15.4-Inch (late 2011) version</a>, not only because of saving some bucks, but also since the <a href="http://www.anandtech.com/show/5113/apple-15inch-macbook-pro-late-2011-review">Apple MacBook Pro early 2011 performs better in most of the situations compared to the late 2011 version</a>.</strong></p>
<p>Besides the heating issues, there are also reported "intermittent flickering, brief blackouts and other periodic but noticeable flaws" reported in the <a href="http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2765598" target="_blank">Apple Discussion Forums</a>. We are getting replacement Machines - let's see if there is any improvement after the first round of shipping!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Screen-shot-2011-03-12-at-17.30.57.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-348" title="Screen shot 2011-03-12 at 17.30.57" src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Screen-shot-2011-03-12-at-17.30.57.png" alt="" width="695" height="214" /></a><span id="more-341"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nanofunk.net/apple-macbook-pro-quad-core-early-2011-i7-fast-powerhorse-design-flaws-and-hardware-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Max/Msp for Live with Ableton Live 8.1 Final REVIEW (max for live)</title>
		<link>http://www.nanofunk.net/max-for-live-ableton-8-1-final-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=max-for-live-ableton-8-1-final-review</link>
		<comments>http://www.nanofunk.net/max-for-live-ableton-8-1-final-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nanofunk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ableton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[examples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[max msp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dsp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[max]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nanofunk.net/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a review of „max for live“ using Ableton Live 8.1 FINAL and max/msp 5.1 on a Mac OSX 10.5.8 Core2Duo Intel MacBook Pro. As I am a frequent user of all kinds of visual DSP systems for quite a while now: pure data (PD), max/msp, vvvv, nord modular OS, etc. - so I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a review of „max for live“ using Ableton Live 8.1 FINAL and max/msp 5.1 on a Mac OSX 10.5.8 Core2Duo Intel MacBook Pro. As I am a frequent user of all kinds of visual DSP systems for quite a while now: <a href="http://www.puredata.org/">pure data (PD)</a>, <a href="http://www.cycling74.com/products/max5">max/msp</a>, <a href="http://vvvv.org/">vvvv</a>, <a href="http://www.clavia.com/main.asp?tm=Products&amp;clpm=Nord_Modular_G2">nord modular OS</a>, etc. - so I am quite dazzled what max for live has to offer. (<a href="http://www.nanofunk.net/max-for-live-ableton-8-1-final-review" title="ableton live and max/msp max for live final review on nanofunk.net">Read the full Entry</a> to see the Review)</p>
<p><img src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/maxforlive_toolbox.png" alt="maxforlive_toolbox.png" border="0" width="531" height="220" class="aligncenter" /></p>
<p>Instruments, Audio Effects, Midi Effects - but of course, this is not all of the cake. Imagine you can create user-interface elements however you please and also assign MIDI to that interface parts. This brings Ableton Live huge steps forward: the possibility to extend ableton to include a full featured audiovisual prototyping environment and to interface with the world: be it sensors, webservices or other Ableton Live installations.</p>
<p><span id="more-195"></span><strong>1. Installation and Setup</strong></p>
<p>Ableton Live Suite 8.1 (1.4GB download size!) and max/msp 5.1. are out in final versions as of today. As a happy Ableton and max/msp owner, the crossgrade was only 79€ for me (including VAT).</p>
<p>
Right after Live starts up it has to be authorized, so all the extensions would be usable. After everything is set up, the following popup should be visible:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nanofunk_maxforlive_installation_ready.png" alt="nanofunk_creating_livepack_from_ableton_beta.png" title="nanofunk_creating_livepack_from_ableton_beta.png" class="aligncenter" /></p>
<p><strong>2. Overview</strong></p>
<p>There are 3 different ways to include Max for Live patches into Ableton. </p>
<p>a) Instruments<br />
Instruments would be a Synthesizer, a Sampler, etc.<br />
Input: MIDI, Output: Audio</p>
<p>b) Audio Effects<br />
Imagine any Audio Effect you can build here - let's say a Reverb for now.<br />
Input: Audio, Output: Audio</p>
<p>c) MIDI Effects<br />
Controlling and modifying the MIDI flow - like arpeggiators, mathematical functions, midi-sequencers, whatever.<br />
Input: MIDI (or controller values), Output: MIDI</p>
<p>Of course, the whole bandwidth of max/msp is much more than only that. With Max for Live, now it is possible to use <a href="http://www.nealfarwell.co.uk/sensors_interactive.html">sensoric interfaces</a> directly with Ableton Live: such as the <a href="http://infusionsystems.com/catalog/index.php">i-cube</a>, the <a href="http://www.nanofunk.net/new-arduino-mega-microcontroller-board/">arduino microcontroller board</a> and so much else (for example the <a href="http://vipre.uws.edu.au/tiem/?tag=sensor-glove">wireless MIDI Glove</a>).</p>
<p>Interfacing to the "outside world" is also quite easy with max/msp: the netsend and netreceive objects let you connect via socket to e.g. a webservice, RSS-feed, whatever.<br />
See also: <a href="http://maxforlive.loadbang.net/ableton-live-learns-how-to-tweet">Max for Live and twitter integration</a>, the <a href="http://www.akustische-kunst.org/">shoutcast~</a> and <a href="http://www.remu.fr/sound-delta/netsend~/?page_id=7">netsend~</a> objects for sending your audio stream around.</p>
<p><strong>3. First Steps</strong></p>
<p><img src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nanofunk-full-screenshot-abletonlivemax.png" alt="screenshot of ableton live 8.1 beta with max for live" title="screenshot of ableton live 8.1 beta with max for live" class="aligncenter" /></p>
<p>In the screenshot above you see where the "Max Instrument" can be found in Ableton Live. In the right corner you can also see the first Instrument example I built: a sine wave oscillator.</p>
<p>a) <strong>Example: Sine Wave Oscillator Instrument with Signal Oscilloscope</strong> [<a href="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/01_sine_wave_oscilator.amxd_.zip">download the patch</a>]</p>
<p><img src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nanofunk-ableton-maxforlive-sine-wave-oscillator.png" alt="Sine Wave Oscillator Instrument with Signal Oscilloscope" title="Sine Wave Oscillator Instrument with Signal Oscilloscope" class="aligncenter" class="aligncenter" /></p>
<p>This is a very basic patch: <strong>notein</strong> gets the MIDI note played, <strong>ddg.mono</strong> simplifies monosynth creation by dealing with last-note priority and note-on/note-off pairing, <strong>mtof</strong> (MIDI to frequency) translates the MIDI note to a frequency which is pushed to the <strong>cycle~</strong> object (sine wave generator). The cycle~ then sends its audio-output to <strong>plugout~</strong> which gets routed back to Ableton Live. Play the Sine Wave Oscillator as you would play any other instrument in Ableton Live: either via keyboard or via MIDI tracks.</p>
<p>b) <strong>Example: Simple Delay</strong> [<a href="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/02_simple_delay.amxd_.zip">download the patch</a>]</p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nanofunk-simple-delay-max_for_live.png" alt="nanofunk-simple-delay-max_for_live.png" border="0" width="320" height="194" /></div>
<p>This is also a rather simple patch. The incoming signal is delayed for a specific amount of time using the <strong>tapin~</strong> and <strong>tapout~</strong> objects. The tapin~ object is a continually updated buffer that stores the most recent signal it has received, and <strong>tapout~</strong> accesses that buffer at one or more specific points in the past. The sound is mixed with its delayed version to create a sort of reflection.</p>
<p>What you can see in the screenshot below is how to implement images in patches that get loaded also to Ableton (using the fpic object) and which part is actually displayed in Live: everything below the black line is "invisible".<br />
Test out the patch with the presets and also try to change the tapin~ and tapout~ values (use it as an audio effect on any soundfile. percussion or drums may be the best to hear the difference).</p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nanofunk-simple-delay-max_for_live-full-patch.png" alt="nanofunk-simple-delay-max_for_live-full-patch.png" border="0" width="294" height="374" /></div>
<p><br/><br />
c) <strong>Example: 8-Step-MIDI-Repeat</strong> [<a href="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/03_midi_8step.amxd_.zip">download the patch</a>]</p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nanofunk-8step-midi-sequencer-hidden.png" alt="nanofunk-8step-midi-sequencer-hidden.png" border="0" width="287" height="326" /></div>
<p>The patch is also really simple: a <strong>line</strong> object counts from 1 to 9, resetting itself to 1 when it reaches 9 (=8 step), the <strong>select</strong> object checks for values between 1 and 8 and sends the according bang messages to the lights on top. the lights also trigger the <strong>int</strong> object, that saves values and outputs them on demand. this <strong>int</strong> objects are used to save the state of the checkboxes.<br />
everytime an int object outputs a 1 (checkbox=checked), the <strong>select</strong> object on the right side sends the last <strong>notein</strong> event to a <strong>noteout</strong> object, causing the last note to be played again.</p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nanofunk-8step-midi-sequencer-wired.png" alt="nanofunk-8step-midi-sequencer-wired.png" border="0" width="289" height="336" /></div>
<p>The difference between the two above screenshots is: hidden objects. Objects that you don't want to be visible in your Ableton Live surface you can hide with Object -> Hide on Lock (Apple+K).</p>
<div style="text-align:center;"><img src="http://www.nanofunk.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/nanofunk-8step-midi-sequencer-ableton.png" alt="nanofunk-8step-midi-sequencer-ableton.png" border="0" width="566" height="327" /></div>
<p>Patch No.3 repeats your last played note in a step-sequencer style: however you checked your checkboxes, every time the light is active over a checked box, the last note will be played again. Test the 3 different presets and also the freestyle option (entering numbers on your own). Be careful with too low and negative numbers.</p>
<p><strong>3. Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>Max for Live is not only a very huge extension to Ableton Live (as stated above, a lot is possible now, from interfacing with hardware to webservices) but also finally a step in the right direction for the said to be lazy "ableton users": while the mainstream of ableton users use similar effects and instruments, this will change from now on. Instrument-directories such as on <a href="http://maxforlive.com/">maxforlive.com</a> feature lots of already available patches.<br />
Another positive point is since max/msp is there much longer than Ableton Live and there is lots of educational content, tutorials etc. around. This could bring more people to look and learn about DSP and sound engineering als well as the physics behind audio.</p>
<p>Max for Live has still a few bugs - but what is there already is really something! Maybe one has to see it like this: in the end max/msp got a really cool sequencer ;)</p>
<p><strong>4. Ressources</strong></p>
<p>
* <a href="http://www.ableton.com/maxforlive">ableton.com maxforlive product page</a><br />
* <a href="http://cycling74.com/products/">cycling74 product page for max/msp</a><br />
* <a href="http://www.maxforlive.com">maxforlive.com</a><br />
* <a href="http://cycling74.com/2009/11/22/the-edit-button-has-been-pressed/#more-3443">cycling74: the edit button has been pressed</a><br />
* <a href="http://cycling74.com/docs/max5/vignettes/intro/docintro.html">max 5 help and documentation</a><br />

</p>
<p><!-- Technorati Tags Start --></p>
<p><strong>Technorati Tags:</strong> <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/ableton" rel="tag">ableton</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/max%20msp" rel="tag">max msp</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/abletonlive" rel="tag">live</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/max%20for%20live" rel="tag">max for live</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/sound" rel="tag">sound</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/review" rel="tag">review</a></p>
<p><!-- Technorati Tags End --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nanofunk.net/max-for-live-ableton-8-1-final-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

